Andrew Huberman· PhD
if the protein is low not completely absent if the protein is low the animal consumes more of the diet because it's trying to compensate for the lack of protein
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if the protein is low not completely absent if the protein is low the animal consumes more of the diet because it's trying to compensate for the lack of protein
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you remove the protein from a diet the animal swallows that that that meal ER the gut evaluates that there is no protein in there and it stops eating that meal