The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the evidence is clear that the the strongest offended Mac macronutrient by far is protein so protein um you know I don't think really sugar and fat intake are strong strongly defended in the sense that you can you you're fine if you go without eating sugar right basically you can synthesize sugar from other from amino acids for example
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.