The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think we are fat hunters and you know I was actually on the phone with a client today and I came up with this analogy or this idea that basically humans are like a car and we can either run on unleaded fuel or diesel fuel and those are like carbohydrates and fat and basically you can one on one or the other but you can't run on protein so if you're not running on carbohydrates you better run on fat and getting enough fat is going to get fuel for the car
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.