The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
a couple of things have changed my stance first of all there are a lot of ferally funded stud studies taking place at Stanford and Elsewhere on these compounds second they for whatever reason and I don't quite understand the sociology of it but for whatever reason psychedelics are no longer associated with the kind of counterculture the way they used to be and are in fact heavily associated with some of the veterans groups that are using these for PTSD
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.