The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
There's all the evidence suggesting, that whatever disorder we're talking about, the efficacy is going to be increased, and the risks are going to to be mitigated drastically in the types of models we're talking about with the screening, with the preparation, with the integration of cognitive behavioral therapy, or
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
None the less, obviously, the efficacy rates are going to be higher when you bring it into these medical models, and it's going to be safer.
certainly, if you don't have adequate support, in the form of somebody that can guide you through the sessions, as well as the presessions, which are not done with psychedelics, as well as the so-called integration afterwards, it can be a really slippery slope.