The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, I think that's important. Yeah, I think the the data on um psilocybin for depression, uh MDMA, not recreationally but therapeutically for PTSD, I gain for PTSD and for alcohol and other uh substance abuse disorders is very intriguing and I'm not trying to hedge here and play, you know, but I think it's very interesting.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.