The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Showing that there may be some excellent roles for certain psychedelics in certain clinical context. These are clinical studies done with a psychiatrist present, that is authorized to do that. That can help people through depression, trauma, et cetera.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I don't recommend people do psychedelics recreationally I do think they hold great promise for the treatment of depression and trauma but people need to be careful there are certain people who could not and should not take psychedelics because it would be genuinely unsafe for them um psychologically especially young people
I think that there may come a time and certainly there are clinical trials that are happening now where psychedelics are leveraged toward particular clinical goals these are clinical studies done with a psychiatrist present that is authorized to do that that can help people through depression trauma Etc