Bryan Johnson· Author
After 30, you lose 3–8% of muscle per decade unless you fight it.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
After 30, you lose 3–8% of muscle per decade unless you fight it.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you do nothing you're going to lose x pounds of muscle per decade on a if you're lucky with a tailwind if you train really hard you might be able to reduce it to this amount of loss and if you really go crazy you might even be able to keep it flat
and of course part of that's predicated on the idea that we know there's an inevitability of decline so if you do nothing you're going to lose x pounds of muscle per decade on a if you're lucky with a tailwind um if you train really hard you might be able to reduce it to this amount of loss and if you really go crazy you might even be able to keep it flat
if you do nothing you're going to lose X pounds of muscle per decade on a if you're lucky with a Tailwind um if you train really hard you might be able to reduce it to this amount of loss