The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look in the older like the really old people I mean they kind of look like a you know a very rapidly aged version of a person with Cushing syndrome they've lost all of their muscles right the skin is hanging both of these symptoms are high cortisol and they usually have a little bit of a belly button
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it looks like it's inflammation that really does Us in in the long run which of course brings the proof of a lot of other factors but long story short if you lowered inflammation in an elderly person this restores their response to the anabolic response to protein
and then if we can block that uh what it by limit by lower inflammation which is probably the way to go because if that's actually the the the top Factor that's driving the high cortisol maybe taking a daily aspirin you know it's something that you know all can allow elderly people to react well to their you know normal meals and in fact build muscle mass uh without being staying in this chronically catabolic state