Paul Saladino· MD
the ancient egyptians didn't have seed oils that's wrong actually they did and michael eads shows that in his talk
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the ancient egyptians didn't have seed oils that's wrong actually they did and michael eads shows that in his talk
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but guess what they had seed oils in their diet so isn't that fascinating
The Egyptians appeared to have oils too because in the communities that are anti-carb focused they'll say look the Egyptians didn't have seed oils when in fact they appear to have and and they had carbohydrates and they had atherosclerosis in the mummy