The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the Pacific Islanders very interestingly um some of those they smoke like crazy down there and yet in those populations like the Papua New guineans they would get pneumonia but there was there's no discussion of them having COPD or lung cancer I've never seen any evidence of that at all and yet they they smoke like crazy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.