Andrew Huberman· PhD
Our work suggests that both permanent time policies reduce circadian burden, but Standard Time reduces that burden more https://t.co/HCFmzfR2Pm
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Our work suggests that both permanent time policies reduce circadian burden, but Standard Time reduces that burden more https://t.co/HCFmzfR2Pm
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Our work suggests that both permanent time policies reduce circadian burden, but Standard Time reduces that burden more https://t.co/HCFmzfR2Pm
Our work suggests that both permanent time policies reduce circadian burden, but Standard Time reduces that burden more https://t.co/HCFmzfR2Pm
Locking the clock is better than switching twice a year.
Literally (and data-wise regarding why standard time is better for your health).
10 minutes of bright outdoor light within the first hour of waking anchors the circadian phase and improves sleep onset that night.
Morning sunlight exposure shifts the cortisol awakening response forward, improving daytime alertness.
Long-term morning sunlight reduces age-related macular degeneration risk.
Sleep regularity predicts all-cause mortality more strongly than sleep duration.
Tracking deep sleep on a wearable accurately reflects EEG-measured slow-wave sleep.
Caffeine has a half-life long enough that consumption after 2pm measurably degrades deep sleep in slow metabolizers.