The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
let's consider a person who smokes a pack a day for 20 years we call that a 20 pack year smoker someone who smokes two pack pack a day for 15 years is a 30 pack year smoker that's a person who's dramatically increased their risk of U many cancers including lung cancer and also their risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.