The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
when we look at actual real interventional studies where they take someone's diet they take a group of subjects and in a real experiment and they take carbohydrates out of the diet and they add red meat back in what do they see improvements and inflammatory markers improvements in diabetes and weight loss
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's also multiple studies that i've shown in the past replacing carbohydrates in the diet with 400 grams or 200 grams of red meat showing improvements in crp and markers of insulin sensitivity in diabetics
on the contrary there are many good Interventional studies like this one which show that replacing grain-based carbohydrates with red meat actually reduces inflammation
in fact there are studies in which red meat is substituted for grains that show lowering of inflammation and Improvement in metabolic Health
I can show you guys right now an Interventional study with diabetics where they replaced 6 to 800 grams of carbohydrates the whole grain carbohydrates that you guys love with red meat and their insulin sensitivity got better their inflammation went down