The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I've seen in gyms where someone will be training and someone will tap the muscle of the person who's doing the work, in order, this is consensual tapping of other people's muscles, not walking around - Please. - touching people's muscles please. That to provide that proprioceptive feedback, so that the person doing the exercises becomes more aware of the muscle that they're supposed to be training.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
You'd be surprised how many folks, when you just simply tell them that muscle group right there, and maybe you give 'em a tactical prompt, so you touch it, or you put something against it.