Andrew Huberman· PhD
If you want though like what's probably minimally viable, two, twice per week per muscle. So hamstrings strength, twice per week. That's a good number to get most people really strong.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
If you want though like what's probably minimally viable, two, twice per week per muscle. So hamstrings strength, twice per week. That's a good number to get most people really strong.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
You can do every single day. You don't need to though. So I want to make sure that, like I wasn't saying you have to train a muscle 85% every single day to get it strong. Two is a good number, three is great, but probably even two is really effective.