Andrew Huberman· PhD
what was actually really interesting is we saw I think it was around a 10% increase in type 2 which are fast twitch muscle fiber size so we saw a 10% increase in fast switch fiber size at the end of 3 weeks of tapering
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what was actually really interesting is we saw I think it was around a 10% increase in type 2 which are fast twitch muscle fiber size so we saw a 10% increase in fast switch fiber size at the end of 3 weeks of tapering
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.