Andrew Huberman· PhD
If you go up in age past age 40, every decade that can come down about 10%, and you'll still be in a pretty good slot.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
If you go up in age past age 40, every decade that can come down about 10%, and you'll still be in a pretty good slot.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and the strength losses might even be greater right we're talking about two to three some studies even showing four percent strength loss uh per year
On average, we reach peak muscle mass somewhere between 20 and 30, then lose about 8% per decade after that.