Andrew Huberman· PhD
Need to train to “failure” (until you can no longer move the resistance in good form) to get maximum results?
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Need to train to “failure” (until you can no longer move the resistance in good form) to get maximum results?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
especially if you take sort of that last set each day a pretty close to failure that's going to get some serious work done but you're not going to be so fatigued you can't come back and train it a couple of days later and you'll be fine
because of what we just outlined in the Brin chart you don't have to go to failure to see strength gains especially early or even moderate and I'm talking maybe five plus years in your lifting career
hypertrophy was similar between the groups but the group that went to failure or stayed a few reps shy of failure actually got stronger compared to the group that was taking um most sets to failure
with strength you also have to think about stimulus fat to fatigue ratio because fatigue will Mass strength right
but to maximize strength you're probably better off not touching failure very often
For muscular hypertrophy, you need to get close to failure, but you probably don't need to train to failure to maximize hypertrophy, but you've got to get pretty close.
but to maximize strength, you're probably better off not touching failure very often.
you don't have to train to failure to grow muscle in fact it may actually be a little bit counterproductive just in terms of the fatigue that it causes relative to the stimulus
we know you don't have to train to failure to grow muscle in fact it may actually be a little bit counterproductive just in terms of the fatigue that it causes relative to the stimulus
failure just it induces a lot of fatigue and that's going to mask how much strength you can actually Express when they test it so in general this is kind of minutia that a lot of people don't really need to worry about
it's actually not necessary and also may even could potentially be um problematic in some cases particularly if you're doing like a multi-joint type of exercise because you can increase your injury risk and also as you mentioned like if you're going to failure then you kind of like if you're going to do you can't really do another next set without like you're you're going to affect your performance right
so he recommend a training failure at least once um but then you know you don't need to train to failure every time you train because one yes it compromises your recovery for your next session increases your injury risk all of those things and obviously people are free to train to failure but it doesn't appear to be um optimal or necessary to uh improve your strength or hypertrophy
if you're going to train to failure um Dr shonfeld seemed to recommend doing um machine based exercises versus on free weights because the injury risk and the risk of you know an accident happening is lower if you're on a machine