The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
by the time it happened five times I was kind of like so that's sort if we I'd be willing to bet both amigdalas that had we recorded from my amigdalas he got one on each side of the brain you would find that that the first time was a big increase in activity lesser second third fourth fifth and you attenuate you habituate
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.