Rhonda Patrick· PhD
The problem with many trials is they never measure micronutrient levels before/after treatment.
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
The problem with many trials is they never measure micronutrient levels before/after treatment.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
several of the studies included in this me metaanalysis did not measure the concentration of vitamins and minerals in individuals in the study at Baseline or followup therefore any negative data is difficult to interpret and no conclusions should be made because it's impossible to know whether or not the dosing was adequate of vitamins and minerals and or whether or not people were compliant