The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I do take methyl folate and methyl B12 um and again the the the rationale there is um I do think there's some evidence that elevated levels of homosysteine are uh bad in and of themselves so there's no denying the fact that elevated levels of homosysteine are associated with bad things that's unambiguously clear meaning there's an association between Badness and homocysteine what's not clear is is it causal
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I take methyl folate and methyl B12 um I use gerro as a brand um again here we do have biomarkers you can measure B12 levels but more than anything I'm measuring homosysteine levels that's why I'm taking methylated versions of those and basically I take these to keep homosysteine below nine and um that for me just means just taking one a day so I take the standard dose uh of that they do make it in two strengths and I take the lower of the two