The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
currently the protocol is 100 supplements • per day thereabouts and a lot of people • that's alarming to them they're like why in the world do you do that that's nuts that must mean there's a diet insufficiency or there's something wrong it's not • we are the 100 supplements is basically a design of if you take everything possible
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.