Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
How quickly to cycle it, meaning do you do two weeks on, two weeks off? Whether or not you need to do more rapid cycling like two days on, two days off, is a matter of debate. There are not a lot of data on this just yet. There are a lot of opinions about this on the internet, but again, not a lot of quality peer review data.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.