Andrew Huberman· PhD
Mucuna pruriens, I've tried. I should just mention it was too dopaminergic for me. I got really, really jazzed up and then a severe crash for me the next day.
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Mucuna pruriens, I've tried. I should just mention it was too dopaminergic for me. I got really, really jazzed up and then a severe crash for me the next day.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
However, I should mention that any time you consume a substance that increases dopamine by mimicking dopamine or acting as a direct precursor to dopamine, there's almost inevitably a crash or a reduction in the baseline in dopamine that we referred to previously.
Mucuna pruriens is actual L-dopa. It's 99% L-dopa, which is a prescription drug that is given for Parkinson's and for other purposes where increasing dopamine is important. I don't recommend mucuna pruriens. I'm not saying that no one should take it, but I don't take it. And I don't recommend it because it tends to so potently and acutely increase dopamine, that there's a pretty substantial crash afterwards.
Mucuna pruriens is actually 99% l-DOPA, the precursor to dopamine. I don't necessarily recommend Mucuna pruriens. It tends to make people very dopaminergic-- drive, drive, drive, drive, motivated, and then crash. Again, depleting that pool.