The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so that means that if you let's say if for assume for a second that the diabetes the inability as glucose is basically caused by over supply of fat into the cell then anything that that we can do to either limit the supply fat or increase the relative abundance of glucose relative to the fat should have therapeutic therapeutic effects
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so that means that if you let's say if assume for a second that the diabetes the inability of tonight's glucose is basically caused by oversupply of fat into the cell then anything that that we can do to either limit the supply fat or increase the relative abundance of glucose relative to the fat should have therapeutic therapeutic effects