Andrew Huberman· PhD
So, basically, they also are more likely to get multiple sclerosis. This has all been done with Mendelian randomization.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So, basically, they also are more likely to get multiple sclerosis. This has all been done with Mendelian randomization.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
People with MS have been shown to have SNPs that affect vitamin D metabolism.
People with common versions of genes that lead to low vitamin D have a 2-fold increased risk for multiple sclerosis.
Strong genetic evidence also suggests that vitamin D may be directly protective against multiple sclerosis.
People with common versions of genes that lead to low vitamin D have a 2-fold increased risk for multiple sclerosis.