Andrew Huberman· PhD
For years, we did a one-mile version of this, and there's just a lot more science on the 12-Minute Cooper Test.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
For years, we did a one-mile version of this, and there's just a lot more science on the 12-Minute Cooper Test.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
If you don't have access to that, you can do a couple of tests. One of them is called a 12-Minute Cooper's Test. So this is simply time. You're going to run for 12 minutes as far as you can, and you're going to record the distance you covered.
You can get a good estimation using the 12-mile run test.
but it can also be measured or estimated rather using things like the Cooper 12-minute test um which essentially involves you just running kind of as far as you can in 12 minutes and there are online calculators where you can put your time into there to get an estimate