The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
there was a paper in jamama uh 6,300 participants followed for uh 10 to 11 years and the people who simply walked seven th000 steps per day compared to less than that had in up to 70% lower risk of all cause mortality in the follow-up period
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The sweet spot for longevity was 7K to 10K steps daily steps, a 40% reduction in deaths.
there's a recent study showing in middle-aged adults looking at life expectancy as a function of number of steps taken and people compared to people who are less than 4 000 steps a day people who are getting 8 000 steps a day had a 50 reduction in mortality during uh 12-year follow-up and people were getting up to 12 000 steps a day that was the peak i mean if it plateaued there above that it didn't go down further but there was a 67 reduction in mortality