The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
MRI has a very high sensitivity in English that just means if a cancer is present an MRI is very likely to see it um but it has a very low specificity which means in English it will see a bunch of things and think they are cancer when they are not and it's most troubled by glandular tissue
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I mean I can't tell you how many useless thyroid nodules we've had to get ultrasounds on that prove to be absolutely nothing and you but you have to follow them for a couple of years to make sure they're nothing