Our read is that using sleep tracking devices is well supported for enhancing health and performance.
Our read is that wearable devices like WHOOP, Oura Ring, and Apple Watch are useful for tracking health metrics and developing intuition about physiological responses to lifestyle choices.
These devices can inform users on how to modify nutrition, exercise, sleep, and lifestyle to maximize health and performance, with some experts noting benefits from consistent, excellent sleep guided by such data.
However, one expert cautions against allowing sleep scores to solely drive perceptions of readiness for work or cognitive function, and another notes that tracking can cause anxiety.
Paul Saladino does not track sleep metrics with devices like the Oura ring because it can negatively impact his sleep by causing anxiety about sleep scores (Paul Saladino, 1x). Andrew Huberman advises that sleep scores from devices like Eight Sleep, Whoop, or Oura rings should not drive the perception of one's readiness for hard work or cognitive function (Andrew Huberman, 1x). The Oura ring is not intended for nighttime erection measurement (Bryan Johnson, 1x).
The verdict would change if new information emerged indicating that sleep tracking devices are consistently inaccurate, or if the psychological detriments of tracking, such as anxiety, were found to outweigh the health and performance benefits for a majority of users.
Benefits hold across the populations where it's been tested.
Mechanistic and trial evidence converge on a real, replicable effect.
Benefits hold across the populations where it's been tested.
The effect size is large enough to matter clinically, not just statistically.
The effect size is large enough to matter clinically, not just statistically.
Confounding and publication bias inflate the apparent benefit.
Confounding and publication bias inflate the apparent benefit.
Animal-model results don't translate to the human protocol being recommended.
Animal-model results don't translate to the human protocol being recommended.
Confounding and publication bias inflate the apparent benefit.