Andrew Huberman· PhD
if anything it may be a net neutral most of the time it's a net negative and what I'm pulling from all of the discussion we've had up until now is that improved blood flow and strong hydration status are both important
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
if anything it may be a net neutral most of the time it's a net negative and what I'm pulling from all of the discussion we've had up until now is that improved blood flow and strong hydration status are both important
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And sort of like along those same lines, smoking, alcohol, bad food, eating processed foods, eating foods that are rich and fats and chemicals and all that gross stuff.
A lot of people don't know this, but alcohol also uh shown in research to be pretty bad for our skin.
I'm not a fan of alcohol I think it's pretty much net negative