Paul Saladino· MD
the strongest intervention studies typically find little relationship between gi and gr gr being glycemic response essentially glycemic load and physiological measures of disease risk even for observational studies
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the strongest intervention studies typically find little relationship between gi and gr gr being glycemic response essentially glycemic load and physiological measures of disease risk even for observational studies
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
gi and gl so glycemic index glycemic load have essentially no predictive value when it comes to cardiovascular disease or diabetes
gi and gl so glycemic index glycemic load have essentially no predictive value when it comes to cardiovascular disease or diabetes
the relevance of glycemic index and glycemic load for prediction of body weight diabetes and cardiovascular disease is piss poor
there's good studies that look at the glycemic index and the cic load of foods and there's really no correlation with these and overall health outcomes in humans or cardiovascular disease outcomes