We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I strongly believe that the audio analysis the what that causes is wrong the LDL is not directly toxic to the opinion that had a high LDL on a honey listen teacher the guy is nothing to worry about and that there are other things driving me the beginning of plaque formation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the evidence that suggests that Oh Theo is directly causing or directly implicated in the formation of a thorough attic plaque or the progression of heart disease is is pretty pretty weak
so therefore you know the evidence should just forget LDL in fact nowadays I don't even bother thinking about it I know whether people are still in this position where it's the thing I long ago realized it isn't the thing and it can't be the thing and it's something else
and I think that the whole idea that LDL really has anything to do with heart attacks that's a humongous huge other discussion
the Western Medical establishment as we discussed clearly believes that in a geometric fashion more LDL equals more atherosclerosis
i don't believe that these paradigms hold true this is the mainstream perspective over the last six years and i think it's totally wrong and we've been wildly misled
i don't believe that these paradigms hold true this is the mainstream perspective over the last six years and i think it's totally wrong and we've been wildly misled