The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I mean many years ago there was a paper I mean it had some issues with replication down the line but where I think it was Joe Chen at Princeton um introduced maybe a mutant or an extra I've forget now it's been a while um case in point I clearly don't have this receptor uh to uh the NMDA receptor which is involved in plasticity and a sub region of the hippocampus the idea was they were trying to make super smart mice
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.