Supreme Court judges' rulings on parole decisions are more lenient after meal breaks, suggesting that judges' decisions are influenced by their hunger state.

“the Supreme Court judges they they looked at Supreme Court Judge rulings on on parole decisions um across the day relative to meal breaks and you can see right after it's like it's like breakfast you know 90% everybody's getting P everybody's getting out yeah and then it just drops to 10% then there's lunch then we're back to 80% and then it just precipitously drops to single digits again W so the judges are changing the leniency of their rulings depending on how wellfed they are you know there there are counterarguments to this but that is strongly what the data suggests”