Andrew Huberman· PhD
what you hinted at is the same reasons why we don't ice injuries because it limits our body's ability to to heal so it rate limits and it might do it by phasal constriction
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
what you hinted at is the same reasons why we don't ice injuries because it limits our body's ability to to heal so it rate limits and it might do it by phasal constriction
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I was taught I learned that when you injure yourself you're supposed to ice something you're supposed to put ice on it but I didn't realize this but when speaking to exercise physiologists and some Physicians they said that the ice is really more of a placebo it numbs the the environment of the injury which is not surprising and will eliminate the pain for a short while but it has some negative effects that perhaps offset its use it actually can create some like clotting and sludging of the of the tissue and fluids which is bad because you want the macras and the other cell types phagocytosing eating up the debris and and injury and moving it out of there so that it can repair