Andrew Huberman· PhD
In fact, we can measure it in such a way that we can predict when somebody's going to die based on the changes in those chemicals.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
In fact, we can measure it in such a way that we can predict when somebody's going to die based on the changes in those chemicals.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Measuring the pattern of chemicals on DNA called methyls (-CH3) is a representation of the cell's environment, and can predict aging and lifespan