it's important that they develop they've got to give the foot time to adapt to not having the orthotic
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's important that they develop they've got to give the foot time to adapt to not having the orthotic
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, if they're used to wearing this big bulky cushion shoe, you don't want to take them into something like this too soon. They'll be like, "This sucks and I don't want to do it." And then you lose them right out of the gates.
So, for example, if I'm working with, you know, just someone who wants to walk, for example. We'll put them into a um Ultra, for example, wide toe buck shoe, >> zero drop, and we'll just have them start like five or 10 minutes, see how they feel. And then we can start to transition the stack height. So if they're used to wearing this big bulky cushion shoe, you don't want to take them into something like this too soon.