The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
very slow movements can be beneficial if one is already proficient in a practice when should you start to introduce slow learning well it appears that once you're hitting success rates of about 20 2 or 30% that's where the super slow movements can start to be beneficial
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it appears that ultr slow movements should be performed after some degree of proficiency has already been gained in that particular movement