Andrew Huberman· PhD
So it's probably going to help your growth hormone and subsequently IGF-1 levels, which will help more in the older age groups than younger age groups.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So it's probably going to help your growth hormone and subsequently IGF-1 levels, which will help more in the older age groups than younger age groups.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, it's probably going to help your growth hormone and subsequently IGF-1 levels, which will help more in older age groups than younger age groups.
it's like wait a minute no because i'm not eating for 16 hours a day how am i over stimulating mtor like you can check my fasting igf-1 in the morning and it's going to be low
He does a lot of work on fasting and the effects of fasting on IGF-1 levels, and the effects protein on IGF-1. And their relationship to aging, and age related diseases.
Time-restricted eating produces fat loss independent of total calories.
A 72-hour fast measurably improves autophagy markers in healthy adults.
One-meal-a-day (OMAD) eating patterns increase all-cause mortality in long-running cohort data.
Eating the largest meal before 3pm improves 24-hour glucose vs. an evening-heavy schedule, calorie-matched.