Andrew Huberman· PhD
It's not really about restricting your feeding. It's about accessing the beauty of the fasted state, now, there are other ways to clear out blood glucose that involve supplements or prescription drugs.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
It's not really about restricting your feeding. It's about accessing the beauty of the fasted state, now, there are other ways to clear out blood glucose that involve supplements or prescription drugs.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
We discuss the benefits of time restricted feeding & extended fasting for longevity, along w/ foods to eat for promoting health & those to avoid.
it's not so much the the satiety that you get from from eating it's the period when you're not eating that's critical
it's not so much the the satiety that you get from from eating it's the period when you're not eating that's critical
Time-restricted eating produces fat loss independent of total calories.
A 72-hour fast measurably improves autophagy markers in healthy adults.
One-meal-a-day (OMAD) eating patterns increase all-cause mortality in long-running cohort data.
Eating the largest meal before 3pm improves 24-hour glucose vs. an evening-heavy schedule, calorie-matched.