Andrew Huberman· PhD
Some believe that it might extend lifespan. I think that's still a bit of an open question.
Loading…
Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
Some believe that it might extend lifespan. I think that's still a bit of an open question.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
What would happen in mice that aren’t cancer prone?
which is how do we delineate and understand the dosing and frequency of fasting as a tool in other words when I talk about doing a fast of three days every month versus seven days a quarter versus five days a quarter how could we possibly get a handle on what the ideal strategy is
Time-restricted eating produces fat loss independent of total calories.
A 72-hour fast measurably improves autophagy markers in healthy adults.
One-meal-a-day (OMAD) eating patterns increase all-cause mortality in long-running cohort data.
Eating the largest meal before 3pm improves 24-hour glucose vs. an evening-heavy schedule, calorie-matched.