Andrew Huberman· PhD
Well, as long as it's at the end or the beginning of the day, because then you add that to the sleep period where you're hopefully not eating.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Well, as long as it's at the end or the beginning of the day, because then you add that to the sleep period where you're hopefully not eating.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So when people say I'm skipping lunch, that's not as helpful.
because we got to remember here is that there's a period of sleep in which you are not eating. And so what you're really doing is tacking on hours >> to the front of that and tacking on hours to the back of that.
Time-restricted eating produces fat loss independent of total calories.
A 72-hour fast measurably improves autophagy markers in healthy adults.
One-meal-a-day (OMAD) eating patterns increase all-cause mortality in long-running cohort data.
Eating the largest meal before 3pm improves 24-hour glucose vs. an evening-heavy schedule, calorie-matched.