The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
We we need way more study to really be able to answer. Okay. And and and people shouldn't be left, this is my just me just speaking as it's kind of amazing to me how much we're left on our own to be figuring out what the risk of individual products is. And I I think it's a place where we should be investing a lot more to get clarity on where the real risks are.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.