Bryan Johnson· Author
Fast agers were 16% more likely to die and 23% more likely to develop a chronic disease. That means they were 65% more likely to die in the cohorts than those at normal or slow aging.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Fast agers were 16% more likely to die and 23% more likely to develop a chronic disease. That means they were 65% more likely to die in the cohorts than those at normal or slow aging.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Even being slightly above an aging rate of 1 biological year/chronological year can increase your risk of death by 56% in the next 7 years and increase your risk of a chronic disease diagnosis by 54% over the next 7 years.
even being slightly above an aging rate of one biological year per chronolog IAL year can increase your risk of death by 56% in the next 7 years
The fastest epigenetic agers have a 158% higher risk of early death compared to the slowest agers.