Bryan Johnson· Author
you can do filler under the eye to do it but the problem is that just masks the aging and also the filler migrates and so we've not we've tried to not do anything that masks aging
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
you can do filler under the eye to do it but the problem is that just masks the aging and also the filler migrates and so we've not we've tried to not do anything that masks aging
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The problem with filler is it can migrate and become a nightmare. So I would strongly recommend you do not do filler under eye. It can be very complicated.