Andrew Huberman· PhD
does the mutation always cause a deficiency that it needs to overcome? Because of mutations in biology sometimes give us super powers, right?
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
does the mutation always cause a deficiency that it needs to overcome? Because of mutations in biology sometimes give us super powers, right?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Because of mutations in biology sometimes give us super powers, right? Occasionally, you'll get somebody who has better than 2020 vision, and they can see better than 99.9% of people out there. So, when you talk about a machine playing a game against a mutated version of itself, is the mutation always say what we call a negative mutation, or an adaptive or a maladaptive mutation?