Andrew Huberman· PhD
You want to get the maximum number of repetitions in and you want to make errors. That's allowing for plasticity.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
You want to get the maximum number of repetitions in and you want to make errors. That's allowing for plasticity.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But during those initial sessions, the key is to make many errors to let the reward process govern the plasticity, let the errors open the plasticity.
Now first of all, this principle of errors queuing attention and opening the opportunity for plasticity, that's never going to change.
errors cue your nervous system to two things one to error correction and the other is it opens the door or the window for neuroplasticity