Andrew Huberman· PhD
And one thing I found really surprising in researching this episode was that 1 in 25 men carry a copy of a mutation for cystic fibrosis.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
And one thing I found really surprising in researching this episode was that 1 in 25 men carry a copy of a mutation for cystic fibrosis.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So in other words, when you identify a man who does not have CF with a congenally absent vas, there's a very good probability he's a carrier of CF.
And then you have to worry if if there's a 4% chance in America anyway that a partner might carry it. There are two carriers. You have a one in4 chance of having a very affected child.
a congenally absent vas, there's a very good probability he's a carrier of CF.
Because the con very interesting biology but men with cystic fibrosis the most common genetic disease in America have no vast deference.